Making the Case for Complicity-Based Religious Liberty Accommodations

Two Yale law professors say religious liberty should not be accommodated in “complicity” cases such as Masterpiece Cakeshop and Arlene’s Flowers. Their argument fails to recognize that such accommodations are a traditional and necessary part of the American legal framework.

Previous
Previous

Crosspolitic: 14th Amendment Protects the Unborn

Next
Next

The Right to Life in International Law